I finally got my eagerly awaited iPhone 3G yesterday morning and I was disappointed to say the least. At first glance it looked super-slick, luxurious and seemed to be exactly what I was looking for, but looks can be deceiving as the new apple iPhone proved not all it was cracked up to be.

Now, don’t get me wrong, Apple’s iPhone is truly unique and does more things than my laptop can do. The super-cool touch screen is absolutely amazing, music and video-playback couldn’t be any better, GPS Satellite Navigation incase you find yourself lost in the middle of no where, and high-speed super-duper Internet access are just some of its market-leading features.

After a brief look around the iPhone’s applications I noticed that there wasn’t a camcorder…Hmm. Why the hell f’in not? Apple “master of the universe and all things great” haven’t implemented a camcorder? Something’s not right… The Iphone is one of the world’s most eagerly awaited phones and it doesn’t even have something which basic phones have these days.

Personally I think the lack of a default camcorder is so that Apple can make more money by selling the camcorder to consumers separately via the iPhone App Center.

Not only is there a non-existent camcorder which most $30 phones have these days, the actual camera itself is a measly 2 mega-pixels. COME ON! What is that all about? Couldn’t Apple “master of the universe and all things great” have thought about that a little bit better? Why on earth is there only 2mp on a phone which has been eagerly awaited by millions across the world for months on end? It’s a bit ridiculous, don’t-cha think?

Apple should have thought about the features mentioned above in more depth because that’s exactly why I am not going to be using the iPhone any more. Hopefully Apple will fix this issue by Christmas and start offering a 5 mega-pixel version with a camcorder on by default. I guess it’s my own fault for not reading a review.

Comments in regards to this article are greatly appreciated; I would absolutely love to know your views on this subject.

Do you really want to participate in search engine manipulation? The sacred art of search engine optimization is to manipulate the search engines into thinking your site is more relevant than the others. Do you honestly think your site is better than the rest of the sites which are also competing for that specific phrase? Think again…

If you’re even considering hiring a search engine optimization company it’s because you want to be found for a specific keyword or key-phrase, right? Well, don’t you think if your web site was relevant enough, the search engines would realize that and put your site where it belongs?

I am sick and tired of search engine optimization consultants manipulating the results for personal gain. I hate using search engines knowing somebody has paid to be placed there at the top for a keyword I am searching for. It’s the lowest form of Internet marketing there possibly is and the search engine optimization consultants should be ashamed of themselves for decreasing search engine appeal.

If your content is good enough you shouldn’t even need to consider hiring a seo company, focus on making your content not just good, but great. If your content is good enough, the search engines will find it and place it in the search engines where is really belongs.

Quit looking for search engine optimization companies to do your sleazy-ass work for you, it’s immoral, it’s unethical and it’s really getting on my nerves more than you could possibly imagine.

For the seo company’s/seo consultants reading this, I have a few things to say to you. If you don’t stop solely doing seo for clients instead of a full range of Internet marketing services, I will personally hunt you down and tare your mother fuk’in head off for ruining the search engine results pages for everybody else on the Internet.